Expand the section navigation mobile menu

Community Changemaker Challenge Grants

Funding will be made available through the President’s Office for two, two-year grants for up to $200,000 to be used to solve and/or address real-world problems confronting a local community or communities (these could be geographic communities or communities based on shared characteristics).

Community engagement and being a preeminent “steward of place” are priorities for the institution. Indeed, as President Pescovitz notes in the Strategic Vision 2030, “Throughout the strategic planning process, two primary questions were posed: How do we develop our university where community, collaboration, and excellence in education and research are at the core of our endeavor? And how can Oakland be further integrated into our communities, and serve as a catalyst for progress?”

Timetable:
September 18: Grant competition announced
January 8: Submission deadline
February 1: First award(s) announced and two-year funding period begins

Proposal requirements:

  • A demonstrated partnership with a community partner and how that partner will play a role in the project

  • A community-identified need- and/or opportunity-driven project

  • Description of how the grant will solve, help solve or address a problem faced by a community (including multiple metrics)

  • Description of how OU students will be involved in the project. For instance: Will a service-learning course be a portion of the project? Will students be a part of a research team that will investigate and address the specific problem?

  • Emphasis on reciprocal relationships and measurable community impact

  • Sustainability plan: How will this project continue beyond the two-year funding period? What sources of funding might be pursued during (e.g., other grant funding, matched funding, philanthropic funding) and/or after the two-year funding period?

  • Demonstration of expertise on topic, experience working with community partner

Selection Criteria

  • Community impact

    • What community problem will the project solve, partially solve or address and why?

  • OU impact

    • What impact and/or benefit will OU students (e.g., experiential learning opportunity, research opportunity, etc.), faculty (e.g., publications) and/or staff see or experience as a result of this project?

  • Community partner involvement

    • Evidence of a credible process used to solicit community partner input on the problem 

    • Robust, equitable partnership with mutually-beneficial goals

  • Collaboration

    • Evidence of the collaborative roles of community partner(s) and students in execution / implementation of the project

    • Project co-created with shared leadership and accountability

  • Feasibility

    • What is the likelihood of the project achieving its design goals / outcomes? 

  • Sustainability

    • At the end of the two-year funding period how will it be sustained to completion?

    • What plans exist for long-term funding to sustain the program?

  • Experience and/or preparedness

    • Evidence can include, but is not limited to:

      • existing substantive expertise,

      • a track record of community-engaged publication and/or grant funding,

      • existing engagement and partnerships with the community around this issue,

      • established contacts and relationships with community organizations that will be partners in the work,

      • experience managing a sizeable (i.e., $200,000) research budget,

      • experience with IRB or other compliance functions that might be required for the project.

  • Measurement

    • Evidence of a strategy and plan to measure the impact of the project

Proposal Components

Submit all documents as PDF files: standard letter-size pages (8.5 by 11 inches), one-inch margins on all sides, single-spaced, with a font that is at least 11-point. The following documents are required for all proposals:

  1. A one-page cover sheet that contains all of the following elements:

    1. The project title

    2. An abstract (not more than 300 words in length), written in non-technical
      language understandable to lay audiences. The abstract should
      summarize the proposed work, its significance, its goals, the proposed
      project plan, and expected (potential?) outcomes.

    3. The project team (the investigator(s) and all significant/key personnel
      involved in the project). For each team member, provide:

      1. Their name

      2. Their institutional affiliation (if at OU, provide their department or
        unit affiliation)

      3. Their email address and telephone number

      4. Their role on the project (i.e., principal investigator, co-investigator,
        expert, etc.)

    4. The total budget requested - provide the total project cost, as a single line on the cover sheet: full budget details must be provided in the separate budget request form

  2. A project summary (four pages or less) that speaks to the criteria outlined below. The summary must discuss the issue(s) being addressed, the research questions to be answered, the project timeline, community partner involvement, an assessment/evaluation plan, plans for dissemination of project findings, and anticipated impacts. The summary may contain figures and tables if needed, but these count against the page limit. Project summaries longer than four pages will be returned without review. Any reference style is acceptable, provided that it is used consistently throughout: but note that references also count against the page limit.

  3. A three-page budget request, including justification. We recommend using the Research Office’s budget and budget justification templates for developing this document, though you won’t need to provide that level of detail in the one-page budget document: just the budget for each category (personnel, travel, materials, consultant costs, etc.) and information about how you arrived at your numbers for each category, levels of effort, and so on. Do include fringe benefits for any salary requests and graduate student support. Do not include indirect costs. The budget justification must explain the reason for each line item in the proposed budget, and also how you determined, estimated, or calculated the cost. Proposed costs must conform to all applicable University policies and standard costing procedures.

Unallowable Expenses
Community Changemaker grant funding cannot be used for any of the following:

  • Direct funding support for collaborators outside OU

  • Capital equipment (items of durable property that cost a minimum of $10,000 and that are expected to have a useful service life of at least one year)

  • Conference travel

  • Support for graduate students, undergraduate students, and/or postdoctoral researchers who are fully supported on existing research projects. However, if the student or postdoc is only funded for part of the year on one or more existing grants, some or all of their available time can be supported from CCCG funding.

Selection Committee
Dave Dulio, Distinguished Professor, College of Arts and Sciences and Interim Chief
Community Engagement Officer
Jennifer Lucarelli, Associate Professor, School of Health Science
Meaghan Barry, Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences
Nicholas DiPucchio, Assistant Professor, College of Arts and Sciences
David Strubler, Professor, School of Education and Human Services
Amy Banes-Bercelli, Vice Provost, Provost's Office
Dave Stone, Vice President for Research
Paul Fontaine, Research Office
Teresa Rodges, OU-Pontiac Initiative


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 

Does “community” need to be geographically-based close to Oakland University? 

Priority will be given to projects that have local impact and align with the Strategic Vision 2030. However, projects with other definitions of community (e.g., affiliation based on similar group characteristics not geographically linked, or in more distant locations) may be considered if they strongly align with the intent and selection criteria of this award.  

What is a “credible process” for soliciting community partner input?

The important element here is that the proposal outlines some kind of pre-arranged method for working with the community partner to identify the problem to be addressed. How this is defined and implemented may vary by project. 

Will projects with smaller budgets be considered? 

Yes, the maximum funding is $200,000 per project, but smaller project budgets will be considered. Investigators are encouraged to determine an appropriately sized budget to meet their project objectives in the 2-year time period.  

What format should be used for the budget justification?

Please contact your grant contract officer in the Research Office or Michael Spires ([email protected]) to get a copy of the Research Office’s standard budget template.

Will new partnerships and projects be eligible for funding? 

While new partnerships and projects will be considered, we anticipate successful applicants will be building upon existing collaborations and preliminary work. This might include needs assessments, pilot projects, and collaborations on things like service learning courses. Faculty with ideas for new collaborations may consider other internal and external funding sources to begin building an effective partnership to prepare for a future Community Changemaker funding opportunity. 

The types of big, bold community issues to be addressed in the Community Changemaker grant competition may take longer than 2 years. What expectations are there for what “outcomes” are achievable at the end of the 2-year funding period? 

By the end of the grant period, there should be evidence of substantial progress towards “moving the needle” forward on the issue being addressed. Depending on the project and context, this may look like dissemination of preliminary results through publications and presentations, grant applications for further work, process and impact metrics, etc. During the grant period, we anticipate substantial progress being made towards strengthening foundations and sustainability of partnerships and projects. It is expected that projects will continue long beyond the funded period, seek external research and/or philanthropic funding for sustainability, and address longer-term impacts. Proposals should elaborate on what outcomes can be measured within the 2-year timeframe, as well as a brief description of medium and long-term impacts.  

Office of Community Engagement

Wilson Hall, Room 3000
371 Wilson Blvd.
Rochester, MI 48309-4452
(location map)
248-370-2190
[email protected]